Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Booth, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Booth, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses 20: 639-643,
© 1995

research-article

Cognitive Processes in Odorant Mixture Assessment

David A. Booth

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK

Correspondence to be sent to: D.A. Booth, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK

‘Comparison of models of odor interaction’ by Cain and his colleagues (1995) is a turning point in assessment of the strengths of smell of mixtures of odorants. Their paper provides the best empirical comparison to date of models of (olfactory) binary mixture intensities and combines this analysis with a cogent critique of the whole tradition of mixture psychophysics. This commentary on their paper argues that their critique is not radical enough. Chem. Senses 20: 639–643, 1995.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.