Skip Navigation

Chemical Senses 2004 29(9):763-773; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses Vol. 29 No. 9 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Experimental and Numerical Determination of Odorant Solubility in Nasal and Olfactory Mucosa

Daniel B. Kurtz1, Kai Zhao2, David E. Hornung3,4 and Peter Scherer2

1 Biology Department, Utica College, 1600 Burrstone Road, Utica, NY 13502, USA, 2 Bioengineering Department, University of Pennsylvania, RM 120 Hayden Hall, 3320 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, 3 Department of Biology, St Lawrence University, Canton, NY 13617, USA and 4 Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Daniel Kurtz, Biology Department, Utica College, 1600 Burrstone Road, Utica, NY 13502, USA. e-mail: dkurtz{at}twcny.rr.comand dkurtz{at}utica.edu

Odorant deposition in the nasal and olfactory mucosas is dependent on a number of factors including local air/odorant flow distribution patterns, odorant mucosal solubility and odorant diffusive transport in the mucosa. Although many of these factors are difficult to measure, mucosal solubility in the bullfrog mucus has been experimentally determined for a few odorants. In the present study an experimental procedure was combined with computational fluid dynamic (CFD) techniques to further describe some of the factors that govern odorant mucosal deposition. The fraction of odorant absorbed by the nasal mucosa ({eta}) was experimentally determined for a number of odorants by measuring the concentration drop between odorant ‘blown’ into one nostril and that exiting the contralateral nostril while the subject performed a velopharyngeal closure. Odorant concentrations were measured with a photoionization detector. Odorants were delivered to the nostrils at flow rates of 3.33 and 10 l/min. The velopharyngeal closure nasal air/odorant flows were then simulated using CFD techniques in a 3-D anatomically accurate human nose modeland the mucosal odorant uptake was numerically calculated. The comparison between the numerical simulations and the experimental results lead to an estimation of the human mucosal odorant solubility and the mucosal effective diffusive transport resistance. The results of the study suggest that the increase in diffusive resistance of the mucosal layer over that of a thin layer of water seemed to be general and non-odorant-specific; however, the mucosa solubility was odorant specific and usually followed the trend that odorants with lower water solubility were more soluble in the mucosa than would be predicted from water solubility alone. The ability of this approach to model odorant movement in the nasal cavity was evaluated by comparison of the model output with known values of odorant mucosa solubility.

Key words: nasal mucosa, odorant solubility, olfactory mucosa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
V. Chen and B. P. Halpern
Retronasal but Not Oral-Cavity-Only Identification of "Purely Olfactory" Odorants
Chem Senses, February 1, 2008; 33(2): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
P. M. Wise, S. E. Toczydlowski, and C. J. Wysocki
Temporal Integration in Nasal Lateralization of Homologous Alcohols
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2007; 99(1): 254 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
P. M. Wise, T. M. Canty, and C. J. Wysocki
Temporal Integration in Nasal Lateralization of Ethanol
Chem Senses, March 1, 2006; 31(3): 227 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. A. Schoenfeld and T. A. Cleland
Anatomical Contributions to Odorant Sampling and Representation in Rodents: Zoning in on Sniffing Behavior
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 131 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
K. Zhao, P. Dalton, G. C. Yang, and P. W. Scherer
Numerical Modeling of Turbulent and Laminar Airflow and Odorant Transport during Sniffing in the Human and Rat Nose
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. W. Scott
Sniffing and Spatiotemporal Coding in Olfaction
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 119 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
P. M. Wise, T. M. Canty, and C. J. Wysocki
Temporal Integration of Nasal Irritation from Ammonia at Threshold and Supra-threshold Levels
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2005; 87(1): 223 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.