Chem. Senses 28: 695-704,
2003
© Oxford University Press 2003
Taste Sensitivities to PROP and PTC Vary Independently in Mice
1 Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201-1509, USA 2 Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201-1509, USA 3 Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: John D. Boughter Jr, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA. e-mail: jboughter{at}utmem.edu
Mammals use common mechanisms to detect, transduce and process taste stimulus information. For example, they share families of receptors that respond to amino acids, and sweet- and bitter-tasting stimuli. Nonetheless, it also clear that different species exhibit unique taste sensitivities that may reflect specific genetic variations. In humans, sensitivities to the chemically similar, bitter-tasting compounds 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) are heritable and strongly correlated, suggesting a common genetic basis. However, it is unknown whether PROP and PTC taste sensitivities are similarly correlated in mice. Here we report that PROP and PTC taste sensitivities vary independently between two inbred strains of mice. In brief-access taste tests C3HeB/FeJ (C3) and SWR/J (SW) mice possess similar taste sensitivity to PTC, while SW mice are significantly more sensitive to PROP than are C3 mice. In two-bottle preference tests, however, SW mice display greater aversion to both compounds. This discrepancy may be explained by the observation that SW mice consumed taste solutions at a greater rate during the intake test than did C3 mice. Therefore, PTC avoidance is correlated with the amount of PTC consumed in the intake tests rather than the concentration of PTC tested. These findings suggest that post-ingestive factors play a significant role in PTC avoidance during intake tests and highlight an important advantage of brief-access tests over intake tests in resolving the gustatory and post-ingestive contributions to taste-related behaviors. Most strikingly, these results demonstrate that in mice, unlike in humans, PTC and PROP taste sensitivities vary independently, thereby suggesting a subtle functional diversity of bitter-taste mechanisms across mammalian species.
Key words: bitter, brief-access test, intake test, mouse
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. L. White, L. V. Dishaw, P. R. Sheehe, and S. L. Youngentob The Relationship between PROP and Ethanol Preferences: An Evaluation of 4 Inbred Mouse Strains Chem Senses, November 1, 2007; 32(9): 847 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. C. Chen, S. V. Wu, J. R. Reeve Jr., and E. Rozengurt Bitter stimuli induce Ca2+ signaling and CCK release in enteroendocrine STC-1 cells: role of L-type voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): C726 - C739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. V. Wu, M. C. Chen, and E. Rozengurt Genomic organization, expression, and function of bitter taste receptors (T2R) in mouse and rat Physiol Genomics, July 14, 2005; 22(2): 139 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. St. John, L. Pour, and J. D. Boughter Jr Phenylthiocarbamide Produces Conditioned Taste Aversions in Mice Chem Senses, June 1, 2005; 30(5): 377 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. I. Glendinning, L. D. Bloom, M. Onishi, K. H. Zheng, S. Damak, R. F. Margolskee, and A. C. Spector Contribution of {alpha}-Gustducin to Taste-guided Licking Responses of Mice Chem Senses, May 1, 2005; 30(4): 299 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. St. John and J. D. Boughter Jr The Contribution of Taste Bud Populations to Bitter Avoidance in Mouse Strains Differentially Sensitive to Sucrose Octa-acetate and Quinine Chem Senses, November 1, 2004; 29(9): 775 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|