Chem. Senses 25: 247-265,
2000
© Oxford University Press 2000
Latency and Accuracy of Discriminations of Odor Quality between Binary Mixtures and their Components
Chemosensory Perception Laboratory, Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0957, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Paul M. Wise, Chemosensory Perception Laboratory, Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), Mail Code 0957, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0957, USA. e-mail: pwise{at}ucsd.edu
Subjects made timed, same–different discriminations of odor quality, with the following principal findings: (i) latency reflected accuracy, with difficult discriminations, i.e. those between 50–50 mixtures and their components, requiring more time than less difficult discriminations, i.e. those between unmixed chemicals. This finding demonstrated the face validity of latency as a measure of qualitative similarity. (ii) Latency provided better resolution among pairs of odors than did errors of discrimination. This finding demonstrated the utility of collecting response times. (iii) Latency-based similarities among odors tested previously predicted similarities among pairs not yet tested. This finding demonstrated internal/predictive validity. (iv) A signal detection model assuming a differencing strategy best described the pattern of errors. Subjects appeared to make relative judgements regarding quality. (v) Finally, latency-based similarities between mixtures and their components demonstrated additivity. This finding suggested that binary mixtures fall on straight lines connecting their components in ‘odor-space’.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. Miyazawa, M. Gallagher, G. Preti, and P. M. Wise Synergistic Mixture Interactions in Detection of Perithreshold Odors by Humans Chem Senses, April 1, 2008; 33(4): 363 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Daly, L. A. Carrell, and E. Mwilaria Characterizing Psychophysical Measures of Discrimination Thresholds and the Effects of Concentration on Discrimination Learning in the Moth Manduca sexta Chem Senses, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 95 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Khan, C.-H. Luk, A. Flinker, A. Aggarwal, H. Lapid, R. Haddad, and N. Sobel Predicting Odor Pleasantness from Odorant Structure: Pleasantness as a Reflection of the Physical World J. Neurosci., September 12, 2007; 27(37): 10015 - 10023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kepecs, N. Uchida, and Z. F. Mainen The Sniff as a Unit of Olfactory Processing Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 167 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Spors, M. Wachowiak, L. B. Cohen, and R. W. Friedrich Temporal Dynamics and Latency Patterns of Receptor Neuron Input to the Olfactory Bulb J. Neurosci., January 25, 2006; 26(4): 1247 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. C. Daly, G. A. Wright, and B. H. Smith Molecular Features of Odorants Systematically Influence Slow Temporal Responses Across Clusters of Coordinated Antennal Lobe Units in the Moth Manduca sexta J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 236 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Wright and B. H. Smith Different Thresholds for Detection and Discrimination of Odors in the Honey bee (Apis mellifera) Chem Senses, February 1, 2004; 29(2): 127 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Ditzen, J.-F. Evers, and C. G. Galizia Odor Similarity Does Not Influence the Time Needed for Odor Processing Chem Senses, November 1, 2003; 28(9): 781 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Olsson and W. S. Cain Psychometrics of Odor Quality Discrimination: Method for Threshold Determination Chem Senses, October 1, 2000; 25(5): 493 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Wise, M. J. Olsson, and W. S. Cain Quantification of Odor Quality Chem Senses, August 1, 2000; 25(4): 429 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|