Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Belknap, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Belknap, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 24: 697-700, 1999
© Oxford University Press 1999

What a Tangled Web We Weave: Discriminating between Malingering and Anosmia

Daniel B. Kurtz1, Theresa L. White1, David E. Hornung1,2 and Elizabeth Belknap1

1 Clinical Olfactory Research Center, Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, SUNY Health Science Center, 750 E. Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210 2 St Lawrence University, Department of Biology, Canton, NY 13617, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Daniel B. Kurtz, SUNY Health Science Center, Room 3232 Weiskotten Hall, 766 Irving Ave., Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. e-mail:kurtzd{at}vax.cs.hscyr.edu

Two groups of normosmic subjects were instructed to feign a total olfactory loss when tested with the Olfactory Confusion Matrix (OCM). One of the groups was given specific instructions as to the number of odorants and trials in the test, as well as the number of items that might be expected to be correctly identified by chance. The responses of both groups of malingerers were compared with responses gathered from a group of anosmic patients. The groups did not differ in terms of performance level (percent correct). In spite of the similarity in terms of accuracy level, an analysis of the pattern of OCM responses to an irritant allowed the anosmic patients to be distinguished from subjects attempting to feign a loss. Subjects were given explicit details about the test performed at the same level as those simply told to feign a loss. These results suggest that the OCM is an effective tool in separating malingering from anosmia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Chem SensesHome page
E. A. Bremner, J. D. Mainland, R. M. Khan, and N. Sobel
The Prevalence of Androstenone Anosmia
Chem Senses, June 1, 2003; 28(5): 423 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Chem SensesHome page
S. L. Youngentob, J. E. Schwob, S. Saha, G. Manglapus, and B. Jubelt
Functional Consequences Following Infection of the Olfactory System by Intranasal Infusion of the Olfactory Bulb Line Varient (OBLV) of Mouse Hepatitis Strain JHM
Chem Senses, October 1, 2001; 26(8): 953 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.