Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (81)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doty, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shaman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doty, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shaman, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses 20: 645-656,
© 1995


research-article

A Study of the Test-retest Reliability of Ten Olfactory Tests

Richard L. Doty, Donald A. McKeown, W. William Lee and Paul Shaman

Smell and Taste Center and Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 3400 Spruce Street and Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: R.L Doty, Smell and Taste Center, 5 Ravolin Pavilion, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Ten tests of olfactory function (including tests of odor identification, detection, discrimination, memory, and suprathreshold odor intensity and pleasantness perception) were administered on two test occasions to 57 subjects ranging in age from 18 to 83 years. The stability of the average test scores was determined across the two test sessions for 14 measures derived from these 10 tests and for subcomponents of the Japanese T&T olfactometer threshold test. In addition, the test-retest reliability (Pearson r) of each test measure was established. With the exception of a response bias measure, the average test scores did not differ significantly across the two test sessions. Statistically, the reliability coefficients of the primary test measures fell into three general classes bound by the following r values: 0.43–0.53; 0.67–0.71; 0.76–0.90. Detection threshold values were more reliable than recognition threshold values; those based upon a single ascending presentation series were much less reliable than those based upon a staircase procedure. The relationship between test length and reliability was examined for several of the tests and mathematically modeled. For example, within the staircase series incorporating the odorant phenyl ethyl alcohol, reliability was related (R2=0.984) to the number of reversals included in the threshold estimate by a function derived from the Spearman-Brown formula; namely, reliability = 0.455* # reversals/[1 + 0.455 (# reversals – 1)]. Reversal location, per se, had little influence on reliability. Overall, this study suggests that (i) considerable variation is present in the reliability of olfactory tests, (ii) reliability is a function of test length, and (iii) caution is warranted in comparing results from nominally different olfactory tests in applied settings since the findings may, in some instances, simply reflect the differential reliability of the tests. Chem. Senses 20: 645–656, 1995.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
P. C. Baier, S. L. Weinhold, V. Huth, B. Gottwald, R. Ferstl, and D. Hinze-Selch
Olfactory dysfunction in patients with narcolepsy with cataplexy is restored by intranasal Orexin A (Hypocretin-1)
Brain, October 1, 2008; 131(10): 2734 - 2741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. Albrecht, A. Anzinger, R. Kopietz, V. Schopf, A. M. Kleemann, O. Pollatos, and M. Wiesmann
Test-Retest Reliability of the Olfactory Detection Threshold Test of the Sniffin' Sticks
Chem Senses, June 1, 2008; 33(5): 461 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. M. Pinto, S. Thanaviratananich, M. G. Hayes, R. M. Naclerio, and C. Ober
A Genome-Wide Screen for Hyposmia Susceptibility Loci
Chem Senses, April 1, 2008; 33(4): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
I. A. Tourbier and R. L. Doty
Sniff Magnitude Test: Relationship to Odor Identification, Detection, and Memory Tests in a Clinic Population
Chem Senses, July 1, 2007; 32(6): 515 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi.Home page
C. G. Kohler, F. S. Barrett, R. C. Gur, B. I. Turetsky, and P. J. Moberg
Association Between Facial Emotion Recognition and Odor Identification in Schizophrenia
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, May 1, 2007; 19(2): 128 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
R S Wilson, S E Arnold, J A Schneider, Y Tang, and D A Bennett
The relationship between cerebral Alzheimer's disease pathology and odour identification in old age
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 30 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi.Home page
D. R. Roalf, B. I. Turetsky, K. Owzar, C. C. Balderston, S. C. Johnson, C. M. Brensinger, R. E. Gur, S. J. Siegel, and P. J. Moberg
Unirhinal Olfactory Function in Schizophrenia Patients and First-Degree Relatives
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, August 1, 2006; 18(3): 389 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
R. L. Doty
Clinical Studies of Olfaction
Chem Senses, January 1, 2005; 30(suppl_1): i207 - i209.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E. S. Choudhury, P. Moberg, and R. L. Doty
Influences of Age and Sex on a Microencapsulated Odor Memory Test
Chem Senses, November 1, 2003; 28(9): 799 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. J. Moberg, S. E. Arnold, R. L. Doty, C. Kohler, S. Kanes, S. Seigel, R. E. Gur, and B. I. Turetsky
Impairment of Odor Hedonics in Men With Schizophrenia
Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2003; 160(10): 1784 - 1789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E. A. Bremner, J. D. Mainland, R. M. Khan, and N. Sobel
The Prevalence of Androstenone Anosmia
Chem Senses, June 1, 2003; 28(5): 423 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
B. I. Turetsky, P. J. Moberg, S. E. Arnold, R. L. Doty, and R. E. Gur
Low Olfactory Bulb Volume in First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Schizophrenia
Am J Psychiatry, April 1, 2003; 160(4): 703 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
T. T. Postolache, T. A. Wehr, R. L. Doty, L. Sher, E. H. Turner, J. J. Bartko, and N. E. Rosenthal
Patients With Seasonal Affective Disorder Have Lower Odor Detection Thresholds Than Control Subjects
Arch Gen Psychiatry, December 1, 2002; 59(12): 1119 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
S. Heilmann, G. Strehle, K. Rosenheim, M. Damm, and T. Hummel
Clinical Assessment of Retronasal Olfactory Function
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, April 1, 2002; 128(4): 414 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
N. D. Abolmaali, V. Hietschold, T. J. Vogl, K.-B. Huttenbrink, and T. Hummel
MR Evaluation in Patients with Isolated Anosmia Since Birth or Early Childhood
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 157 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
R H McShane, Z Nagy, M M Esiri, E King, C Joachim, N Sullivan, and A D Smith
Anosmia in dementia is associated with Lewy bodies rather than Alzheimer's pathology
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2001; 70(6): 739 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. L. Doty, A. D. Fernandez, M. A. Levine, A. Moses, and D. A. McKeown
Olfactory Dysfunction in Type I Pseudohypoparathyroidism: Dissociation from Gs{alpha} Protein Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 1997; 82(1): 247 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.